Neuroscience communication (BID & ESConet)

3604

Comments

Add

Neuroscience communication (BID & ESConet)

March 15, 2011 Bloggies by Femke Nijboer

Do you have a hard time explaining what a brain-Computer Interface is at a birthday party of your brother-in-law? Does your mother even understand what exactly you do for a living? Could you explain society what value your research has? If not, you may want to check out the announcement below and consider applying for a workshop on communication in neuroscience.

-------

The Brains in Dialogue (BID) team, in collaboration with the European Science Communication Network (ESConet), is pleased to announce the bid Workshop on Neuroscience Communication which will take place on 20-22 June 2011 in Trieste, Italy.

From Alzheimer to Parkinson, from schizophrenia to depression: new technologies in neuroscience are providing very powerful means to investigate how the brain works and find treatments for several psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Even though researchers are still exploring the potentials and limitations of the clinical and non-clinical applications of these technologies, they are more and more often called at explaining and commenting on the latest discoveries and their impact on society in the media and in public settings.

To ensure an appropriate public communication and a fruitful interdisciplinary dialogue, it is therefore crucial for researchers to improve their communication skills and understand the media logic. The bid Workshop on Neuroscience Communication will offer them a chance.

The workshop is mainly intended for neuroscientists and clinicians working on bid scientific areas -brain imaging, brain devices, predictive medicine in brain science-, but applications are also welcome from researchers interested in the social, ethical and legal implications of these technologies. Ideal candidates will be young researchers and principal investigators with at least four years of research experience. Participation to the workshop is free. For more information, please visit www.neuromedia.eu.

Self-assesed wellbeing in the locked-in syndrome (Bruno et al, 2010)

17

Comments

Add

Self-assesed wellbeing in the locked-in syndrome (Bruno et al, 2010)

February 24, 2011 Bloggies by Femke Nijboer

BNCI research may serve to provide an extra modality for control over assitive technology for persons with the locked-in syndrome. Having control over assistive technology may mean that you can maintain or increase your quality of life.

The general audience and many physicians usually assume that quality of life of locked-in patients is low and that such a life is not worth living. One neurologist has even asked the question that "even when you can communicate with a locked-in patient, should you?". He reasoned that BNCI technologies might compel patients to accept life-sustaining treatment more often and that they are thus, at greater risk to have a low quality of life.

Fortunately, this neurologist, the general audience and physicians have been proven consistently wrong. Quality of life in the locked-in syndrom is rated as satisfactory to good by most patients and most patient do consider their lifes worth living.  A recent study by Bruno et al (2010) support this findings. Please find the abstract and a link to the paper below.

ABSTRACT

Objectives Locked-in syndrome (LIS) consists of anarthria and quadriplegia while consciousness is preserved. Classically, vertical eye movements or blinking allow coded communication. Given appropriate medical care, patients can survive for decades. We studied the self-reported quality of life in chronic LIS patients.

Design 168 LIS members of the French Association for LIS were invited to answer a questionnaire on medical history, current status and end-of-life issues. They self-assessed their global subjective well-being with the Anamnestic Comparative Self-Assessment (ACSA) scale, whose +5 and −5 anchors were their memories of the best period in their life before LIS and their worst period ever, respectively.

Results 91 patients (54%) responded and 26 were excluded because of missing data on quality of life. 47 patients professed happiness (median ACSA +3) and 18 unhappiness (median ACSA −4). Variables associated with unhappiness included anxiety and dissatisfaction with mobility in the community, recreational activities and recovery of speech production. A longer time in LIS was correlated with happiness. 58% declared they did not wish to be resuscitated in case of cardiac arrest and 7% expressed a wish for euthanasia.

Conclusions Our data stress the need for extra palliative efforts directed at mobility and recreational activities in LIS and the importance of anxiolytic therapy. Recently affected LIS patients who wish to die should be assured that there is a high chance they will regain a happy meaningful life. End-of-life decisions, including euthanasia, should not be avoided, but a moratorium to allow a steady state to be reached should be proposed.

Click here for the full article.

BCI conference in Utrecht 20-21 May 2011

0

Comments

Add

BCI conference in Utrecht 20-21 May 2011

January 28, 2011 Bloggies by Femke Nijboer

On 20-21 May of this year the Rudolf Magnus Instutute for Neuroscience and the BrainGain consortium will organize an international symposium om Brain-Computer Interfacing in Utrecht (the Netherlands). Speakers include: Brendan Allison, Bernhard Graimann, Eberhard Fetz, Beata Jarosiewicz,  Jean-Philippe Lachaux, Eric Leuthardt, Phil Kennedy, Christa Neuper, Nick Ramsey, Gerwin Schalk, Bill Shain , Andrew Schwartz and Jonathan Wolpaw.

Please click here for the preliminary program. An click here for the website of the conference.

Before this conference the 8th International BCI2000 workshop takes place at the same venue. this workshop is great for getting hands on experience with BCIs adn is highly recommended for students. Please click here for more information.
 

BCI Meeting 2010

534

Comments

Add

BCI Meeting 2010

June 04, 2010 Bloggies by Brendan Allison

I am at the BCI Meeting 2010 in Asilomar, California. This is a meeting of over 250 people with an interest in BCIs and related systems. There are people from many different universities, companies, media entities, grant institutions, and a few others I haven’t figured out yet. Several of us from the Future BNCI consortium are here, as well as persons who work in related EU projects.

 

The conference seems to be going very well. There are a lot of engaging talks and posters, and a strong sense of excitement and anticipation. I would go so far as to say that our field is dancing around a Kuhnian paradigm shift. If so, then the next International Meeting should be even more exciting. If someone presents (for example) a large scale clinical validation of a BCI for rehabilitation, then the field will change dramatically. And a lot of people are working toward BCI for stroke recovery, as well as autism, addiction, ADHD, and psychopathy. There is also a lot of work toward practical BCI systems, which involve dry electrodes or are otherwise easier to acquire, set up, and use.

 

Much of the conference involves workshops. In each workshop, about 8-20 people discuss specific issues, and then present their views to the entire plenary session. This is similar to the workshops from the 2005 conference, but on a much larger scale. I am watching all this eagerly, since we’ll have a similar workshop structure at our September FBNCI conference.

Scientific conferences

2570

Comments

Add

Scientific conferences

May 08, 2010 Bloggies by Brendan Allison

Conferences are another important part of a scientific research career. Science does not proceed in a vacuum. Scientists need to know about research that other scientists produce - as well as other things such as what works, what does't work, new tools available, or new job opportunities. Similarly, scientists need to tell other people about their research to gain publicity, defend their ideas, and be visible. In addition to just exchanging information, getting together helps to develop professional relationships, and direct discussions at conferences often lead to new research collaborations, grant proposals, scientific articles, etc. 

Last year, there was one large international BCI conference, which was hosted by the BCI group in Berlin. The "Links" section of this page has links to the lab and to online talks from that conference. This year, we already had the First TOBI Workshop in Graz in Feb. 2010. About 135 people attended. There will be another international BCI conference beginning on May 31 that will be about twice as large. More information can be found elsewhere on this website.

What do people do at these conferences? Most conferences include these elements:

 

1) Talks. Scientists present a specific research study, a series of studies, a new idea or model, an argument or perspective, a review of work across different groups relating to a specific research direction, etc. These talks are usually followed by a brief question and answer session.

2) Posters. Scientists will bring posters with text, pictures, and sketches that describe their work. The conference organizers provide space where conference attendees can mount their posters, and the schedule includes "poster sessions" in which people will walk around the poster area, view different posters, and discuss them with their authors.

3) Discussion. Scientists will talk about one of the talks, the posters, or a specific topic that is usually announced ahead of time. Sometimes, the schedule will include discussion periods. These discussions may involve smaller groups. For example, panels or workshops may discuss specific topics that relate to a larger theme of the conference, and include experts in those topics.

Of course, regardless of the schedule, a lot of discussion just happens informally, such as during poster sessions, after talks, during coffee breaks, of just bumping in to people in the lobby. Conference attendees will also meet for lunch, dinner, and other typical social events. Many people at conferences are personal friends and/or current or former co-workers or collaborators, and are happy to meet and catch up.

4) Satellite events. Many conference feature satellite events. These are events that are not officially part of the conference, but may be of interest to conference attendees and address related issues. Satellite events usually occur just before or after the conference. These events may include the above elements like talks, posters, and discussions. Some satellite events are etraining events, where people can learn specific advanced material such as the latest new technologies in brain imagine or new drugs to treat certain disroderes.


Scientists have mixed feelings about conferences. On the one hand, they are essential events in a research career for many reasons noted above. Aside from professional reasons, it can be fun to travel and to see old friends, and learning about the latest research is fun to people who really enjoy it. On the other hand, conferences take a lot of time. They usuall last a few days. Plus, you have the added time of traveling, preparing, and recovering. Hence, most experienced scientists are very selective about the conferences they attend, and try to get the most benefit out of each one.